The Treasure of the Sierra Madres (1948) – Review

Fred C. Dobbs (Humphrey Bogart), Howard (Walter Huston), and Curtin (Tim Holt).

John Huston made all kinds of movies, from film noir (The Maltese Falcon), to war movies (The Red Badge of Courage), to heist movies (The Asphalt Jungle), to romantic adventures (The African Queen), to sports movies (Fat City), to religious movies (Wise Blood), and even a musical (Annie). The one type of story he seemed to have been drawn to more than anything else, however, is a character’s quest after something, be it treasure (The Maltese Falcon), love (Reflections in a Golden Eye), a white whale (Moby Dick), or home (The Asphalt Jungle), and while the quest has usually been futile, Huston usually finds something noble or honorable in the quest, especially the futility of it, even when undertaken by less than honorable people. One of the best films Huston ever made along those lines was The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, which he also adapted from the novel by B. Traven (a mysterious figure no one was able to identify).

John Huston as the man Dobbs hits up three times for money.

In 1920’s Mexico, Fred C. Dobbs (Humphrey Bogart) and Curtin (Tim Holt) are two Americans living hand-to-mouth (Huston cameos as another American Dobbs hits up for money three times), including getting work from Pat McCormack (Barton MacLane), a corrupt businessman who has no intention of paying them (at least until they beat him up). One day, they run into Howard (Walter Huston), an elderly prospector who tells them he knows where there’s gold, and he’s willing to go after it, but only if he has partners. When Dobbs wins the lottery, he and Holt now have the funds to go in, and they agree to go with Howard to a spot he’s told them about. At first, it’s slow going, and Dobbs and Curtin are ready to quit, until Howard points them in the right direction. They get enough gold they can dream about what they’ll do with it – Howard just wants a store of his own, while Curtin wants an orchard farm, and Dobbs just wants to spend it all – but there are outside forces to deal with. For starters, there’s Cody (Bruce Bennett), another prospector, whom they become suspicious of. There’s also a group of Mexican bandits, led by Gold Hat (Alfonso Bedoya), whom they tangle with. Most importantly, however, Dobbs starts getting paranoid about the others, especially Curtin, taking his gold away from him.

Dobbs as he becomes increasingly paranoid.

Huston wasn’t often known for his visual sense, as just about every movie he made was an adaptation, and he saw himself as serving the material. However, he and cinematographer Ted D. McCord (a veteran of 20 years whose most distinguished credit before this was Action in the North Atlantic, a so-so WWII movie starring Bogart) do a good job of showing the harshness of the Mexican landscape, which helps contribute to the way the characters, especially Dobbs, are affected by their pursuit of the gold. Unlike many other Hollywood movies of the time, Huston actually casts Mexican actors as Mexicans (though not always; Robert Blake plays the boy who sells the lottery ticket to Bogart), and we hear Spanish spoken by them amongst themselves. Huston, who actually lived in Mexico for a long time, seems to know the territory, and the people well. Some critics then and now complained about Max Steiner’s score being too melodramatic and intrusive, but it’s so well-written and catchy it doesn’t bother me. Huston also handles the theme of greed and how it changes men well without being heavy-handed about it. He’s helped, of course, by the acting. Bogart and Walter Huston weren’t the type of actors who could disappear into their roles, but that doesn’t mean they weren’t good actors, or capable of subtlety. Watch the scene when Dobbs says they should kill Cody, and Howard conveys he’s against it but not willing to argue about it, or the scene where Dobbs finds out what he thought had happened didn’t actually happen. Holt was never the greatest actor, but he holds his own against Bogart and the elder Huston. Treasure of the Sierra Madre is a direct influence on films such as Sam Raimi’s A Simple Plan and Paul Thomas Anderson’s There Will Be Blood (which Claude and I discuss in Part 2 of our latest episode), but it stands out on its own.

Reel 74: The Wages of Greed

Sure, Gordon Gekko told us all that greed, for lack of a better term, is good. And that film sometimes takes the blame for a bunch of unfortunate things that took place in the 1990s.

But there are films out there which note that there’s a darker side to greed (and, to be fair, Wall Street also carries that message; it’s just that people kind of overlooked that part). And in this episode, we look at a pair of films which are years apart from a production standpoint, but whose characters are more or less contemporaneous.

We start with The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948), starring Humphrey Bogart, Tim Holt, and Walter Huston and directed by Walter Huston. Anjelica Huston isn’t in this one because she wasn’t born until 1951, I guess. The trio star as three down-and-out Americans who pursue gold in a remote mine in which others have given up hope. They face all kinds of hardships moving to and from the mine, and there are plenty of adventures in between.

From there we go to another film set at about the same time, but on this side of the US/Mexico border, in the American southwest. There Will Be Blood (2007), directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, stars Daniel Day-Lewis as a man who is determined to amass as much as he can, but it’s far too late when he realizes the price he pays for his success.

Both of these films also have the distinction of being source material for memes and pop culture gags. With Sierra Madre, of course, it’s assorted variations on whether or not any stinkin’ badges are necessary, and in Blood it’s the phrase “I drink your milkshake.” In both cases I’d be willing to bet all the money in my pockets (nearly 80 CENTS, friend) that most people don’t know the source material for either of them.

Finally, before I set you free to listen to the episode (because of course you’ve been riveted to this poetry I’ve been cranking out so far), I offer you this bit of music that we talked about during Part 2:


Yes, I will expect you to send me Thank You notes for bringing this music into your life.

COMING ATTRACTIONS: 

Next time, we stick with the Old West with a pair of films that use that genre as an allegory for anti-Capitalist messages. (What?) Don’t worry; it’ll make a lot of sense before we’re through. First we’ll see McCabe and Mrs. Miller (1971), followed by The Claim (2000). Join us, won’t you?